Masked Edit Control Memory Corruption Vulnerability
Severity: CRITICAL
CVE Identifier: CVE-2008-3704
Advisory Date: JUL 21, 2015
DESCRIPTION
Heap-based buffer overflow in the MaskedEdit ActiveX control in Msmask32.ocx 6.0.81.69, and possibly other versions before 6.0.84.18, in Microsoft Visual Studio 6.0, Visual Basic 6.0, Visual Studio .NET 2002 SP1 and 2003 SP1, and Visual FoxPro 8.0 SP1 and 9.0 SP1 and SP2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long Mask parameter, related to not "validating property values with boundary checks," as exploited in the wild in August 2008, aka "Masked Edit Control Memory Corruption Vulnerability."
nvd: Additional advisory information from Secunia: http://secunia.com/advisories/31498/
TREND MICRO PROTECTION INFORMATION
'Visual Studio 6 was last updated June 2000, a Microsoft spokeswoman told SCMagazineUS.com. The version is no longer supported. Visual Studio 2008 is the latest release and microsoft encourages users to update to the newest version.'
Source: http://www.scmagazineus.com/Microsoft-looks-into-Visual-Studio-bug/article/115459/
SOLUTION
Trend Micro Deep Security DPI Rule Number: 1003126
Trend Micro Deep Security DPI Rule Name: 1003126 - Masked Edit Control Memory Corruption Vulnerability
AFFECTED SOFTWARE AND VERSION
- microsoft visual_basic 6.0
- microsoft visual_foxpro 8.0
- microsoft visual_foxpro 9.0
- microsoft visual_studio 6.0
- microsoft visual_studio_.net 2002
- microsoft visual_studio_.net 2003
Featured Stories
The Mirage of AI Programming: Hallucinations and Code IntegrityThe adoption of large language models (LLMs) and Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPTs), such as ChatGPT, by leading firms like Microsoft, Nuance, Mix and Google CCAI Insights, drives the industry towards a series of transformative changes. As the use of these new technologies becomes prevalent, it is important to understand their key behavior, advantages, and the risks they present.Read more
Open RAN: Attack of the xAppsThis article discusses two O-RAN vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit. One vulnerability stems from insufficient access control, and the other arises from faulty message handlingRead more
A Closer Exploration of Residential Proxies and CAPTCHA-Breaking ServicesThis article, the final part of a two-part series, focuses on the details of our technical findings and analyses of select residential proxies and CAPTCHA-solving services.Read more
How Residential Proxies and CAPTCHA-Solving Services Become Agents of AbuseThis article, the first of a two-part series, provides insights on how abusers and cybercriminals use residential proxies and CAPTCHA-solving services to enable bots, scrapers, and stuffers, and proposes security countermeasures for organizations.Read more